Worth Ba $17M na Kontrato sa Rookie?

by:ShadowSpike231 linggo ang nakalipas
1.35K
Worth Ba $17M na Kontrato sa Rookie?

Ang Tanong Na Hindi Itinatanong

Lumaki ako sa mga alleyway kung деkan ang kontrato—hindi hype, kundi grit. Tinuruan ako ng aking ama: ‘Ang stats ay hindi nag-aalala kung sino ka—kundi ano ang gawin mo.’ Nang makita ko si Durant na may $17M, hindi ko pinagpapalakas—pinagsusuri.

Ang Problema ni Paul

Traded si Paul George dahil hindi siya umuugali sa sistema, hindi dahil masama—dahil sobrang matalino para sa lumang playbook. Ang mid-range fade? Hindi nawala—itinatangi ng algorithm.

Ang Data Ay Hindi Naglilinga—Ang Narratives Ay Gumagawa

Durant: 28 puntos per game, 54% true shooting. Paul: 34% usage rate. Siya’y gumagawa ng chaos—at dito nakikita kung bakit nalimutan.

Ang Bagong Playbook ay Isulat Sa Code

Hindi na basketball ito—data science na nagsusuot ng jersey fabric. Hinihingi namin ang epekensiya, hindi ang emosyon.

ShadowSpike23

Mga like96.16K Mga tagasunod3.04K

Mainit na komento (3)

Laker7Fan911
Laker7Fan911Laker7Fan911
6 araw ang nakalipas

Durant’s $17M deal? Broke my calculator. He didn’t shoot to win championships—he shot to pay his therapist. Paul George? His usage rate is 34%, but his vibe is 0%. The system didn’t fit him… it just rented him out like a faulty GIF in slow motion. What did you feel when this shot went up? Was this the greatest play you’ve ever seen? Or just a really expensive spreadsheet in jersey fabric?

544
59
0
桜の風に咲く花
桜の風に咲く花桜の風に咲く花
5 araw ang nakalipas

杜兰特の1700万ドル契約、おにぎりより大事? でも、彼のシュート率28%は、コンビニの冷えたおにぎりよりも温かい。Paulは34%で混沌を生むけど、彼のプレイは静かな雨夜のベンチで、ママが歌うメロディを流してる。真実:バスケじゃなくて、データサイエンスがジャージャケットを着てる。あなたもひとりじゃない——この瞬間、あなたの涙はコンビニのおにぎりと重なってる。どれが本当の価値? コメント欄に「#おにぎりVSMVP」で投票してね。

146
57
0
NicoDerWolf79
NicoDerWolf79NicoDerWolf79
2 araw ang nakalipas

17 Millionen Euro für einen Rookie? Und der Star verliert im vierten Viertel? In Berlin rechnen wir nicht mit Emotion — wir rechnen mit Usage Rates! Durant schießt 28 Punkte pro Spiel, aber Paul? Der hat 34% — und trotzdem ist er verschwunden wie ein veralteter Algorithm. Die echten Daten lügen nicht — nur die Medien tun das. Wer zahlt für Highlights? Wir zahlen für Effizienz! Was glaubt ihr: Ist das Basketball oder Data Science mit Jersey-Fabric? Kommentiert unten — ich trinke meinen Kaffee und warte auf die nächste Statistik.

159
29
0
Indiana Pacers