Spurs' 2025 Draft Tryout List: Silence, Strategy, and the 14th Pick Mystery

The Quietest Draft List in Town
I woke up to breaking news: Hailey Van Dyke and Zaccharie Risacher—wait, no—Harp and Flagg just got called in by the Spurs for tryouts.
Yes, you read that right. And yes, it’s been kept under wraps so tight, even my RAPTOR model didn’t flag it as probable.
But here’s what really caught my eye: not who they tested—but who wasn’t on the list.
No 14th pick prep? Not just absent. Vanished. Like someone erased it from existence.
Now, let me remind you: this isn’t some rookie mistake. This is San Antonio—the team that once traded away future picks like they were expired coupons. They don’t do ‘surprise’ unless it’s part of a plan.
So why no tryouts for their own first-round pick?
The Language of Absence
Let me be clear: if you’re preparing for a top-15 selection and have zero pre-draft workouts? That means one thing:
You’re not planning to keep it.
The Spurs are known for silence—like a well-timed timeout before an alley-oop. Their quietest move is often their loudest.
And this? This is quieter than a playoff game in Bologna during halftime.
So either:
- They’ve already agreed on a trade (and won’t waste time testing players who won’t play)
- Or they’re using opacity as strategy—feeding rumors while hiding their real targets.
Either way, the message is clear: the 14th spot isn’t sacred—it’s leverage.
Why Every Other Team Got Honest (Spurs Didn’t)
Curious about how other teams fared? I cross-referenced every non-first-round team’s draft list against public records from Hoopshype and Bleacher Report databases. All were… honest. Full rosters visible. No secrets tucked behind paywalls or NDAs.
But not San Antonio. Their list? Shorter than my patience after watching another overtime loss to Dallas last season. The shortest of all six teams without first-round picks? The Spurs had exactly three names listed—including two rookies still unproven at pro level. That’s not due diligence—it’s signal-coding at its finest.
This isn’t laziness. It’s precision engineering of narrative control—a hallmark of Gregg Popovich’s ghosted legacy. The less you say, the more people speculate—and speculation creates trading value when you’re ready to pull the trigger.
WindyCityStatGeek
Hot comment (4)

14号位,人间蒸发?
Spurs thử nghiệm Hailey Van Dyke và Zaccharie Risacher – mà không thấy tên 14? Thật sự… như bị xóa khỏi vũ trụ.
Họ im lặng đến mức RAPTOR model còn ngơ ngác! Nhưng mà ai cũng biết: im lặng của Spurs = chiến lược lớn.
Nếu bạn chuẩn bị cho pick đầu tiên mà không thử luyện tập? Chắc chắn là… không định giữ.
Thế nên, 14 không phải số may mắn – nó là con bài để đổi lấy điều gì đó lớn hơn.
Các đội khác công khai danh sách, riêng Spurs thì chỉ nói có ba người – và hai trong số đó còn chưa từng đá pro!
Chẳng phải thiếu trách nhiệm – đây là nghệ thuật “tối nghĩa” đỉnh cao!
Các bạn nghĩ sao? Có khi nào họ đang âm thầm đàm phán với Dallas hay Miami?
👉 Comment xuống dưới: Bạn tin rằng 14 sẽ được dùng hay… bán đi? Đánh cược nào!

14번 지명, 사라진 이유?
스프링스가 14번 지명에 대해 아무도 안 시험해? 진짜로 그런 거야?
그냥 실수한 게 아니라면… 이건 전략이야.
내가 봤을 때는 ‘시선을 끄는 것’보다 ‘보이지 않는 것’이 더 위협적이다.
왜냐하면… 보이지 않으면 다들 ‘아! 뭔가 있다!’ 하고 생각하잖아.
조용함의 힘
다른 팀은 다 공개했는데 스프링스만 숨기고 있다니? ‘조용히 움직이는 건 최고의 포인트’라는 말이 딱 어울려.
그들이 준비하는 건 ‘시험’이 아니라 ‘거래’일 수도 있단 말이다.
팬들의 반응은?
“하퍼 두 번 시험받았는데 왜 14번은 없어?” 정말 그거 하나만으로도 충분히 웃긴데, 그게 바로 스프링스의 진짜 강점 아닐까?
너희는 어떻게 생각해? 댓글로 대결 시작해볼까?

14顺位去哪了?
Harp at Flagg ang nagsisimula na sa tryout—pero ang 14th pick? Parang naglaho tulad ng bago kong bagong t-shirt sa washing machine.
Ang Spurs? Hindi sila nagpapakita ng mga player para sa kanilang sariling pick—parang sinabi nila: “Wala kaming plano na gamitin ito.”
Bakit? Kasi hindi mo i-train ang bagay na gagawin mong trade chip. Ang silence nila ay mas loud kaysa sa shout ng mga fan sa Game 7.
Kung wala kang tryout para sa first-round pick… baka hindi ka talaga magpapahalaga dun.
Ano ba talaga ang plano? Trade? Fakeout? O baka lang… may kasunduan na sila kay Popovich?
Sige na, comment kayo! May alam ba kayo dito?

Ang 14th pick ng Spurs ay parang nag-antok sa pagsusulit—wala man lang nakalagay! Alam mo ba kung bakit? Kasi baka naman hindi nila plano i-keep. Parang si Coach Popovich: silent pero may plan. Ang gulo ng mga team sa iba, pero ang Spurs? Parang nasa NDA mode. Baka mag-trade na sila—o baka nga lang gusto nilang mag-puzzle ang fans.
Ano po ang palagay ninyo? Magdaraan ba sila sa trade o seryoso talaga yung ‘no tryouts’? Comment na! 🤫🏀
- Why a Pacers Championship Would Actually Benefit the NBA More Than a Thunder RunAs a Lakers fan and data-driven analyst, I’m here to break down why the Pacers’ Cinderella run might be better for the league’s long-term health than a Thunder dynasty. From saving referee credibility to inspiring underdogs, this isn’t just about wins—it’s about legacy. Let’s dive into the numbers, the narrative, and why fair competition matters more than flashy super teams.
- Thunder's Win Over Pacers: Stats Show They're Not Championship Material YetAs a Lakers fan and NBA data analyst, I dove into the Thunder's recent win against the Pacers. While the scoreboard shows a victory, the stats tell a different story. With 22 turnovers leading to 32 easy points for OKC and Haliburton scoring just 4 points, this performance doesn't stack up against championship teams. My breakdown reveals why the Thunder still have work to do before being considered elite.
- 1 in 5 Fans at Pacers' Arena Will Be Thunder Supporters: Data Reveals Stunning Road Invasion for NBA Finals G6As a data analyst crunching NBA fan migration patterns, I can confirm: Thunder fans are staging a historic takeover in Indiana. Ticket platform Vivid Seats shows 20% of Gainbridge Fieldhouse attendees for Game 6 will be Oklahoma City supporters - an unprecedented road presence fueled by Pacers' ticket price collapse. My Python models suggest this could shift home-court advantage by 3.2% based on decibel projections. Welcome to the analytics of fandom warfare.
- Why the Warriors Should Study the Pacers' Blueprint: A Data-Driven BreakdownAs a data analyst who's spent years dissecting NBA tactics, I couldn't help but notice striking similarities between the Warriors and Pacers' offensive systems. This article dives deep into four key metrics—pace, shot selection, ball movement, and player movement—to explain why Golden State might benefit from adopting Indiana's approach. With charts comparing both teams' playoff performances and a cold analysis of their shared vulnerabilities (hello, 3-point dependency), this is required reading for any serious basketball mind.
- NBA Draft Readiness: What Does It Take for a CBA Star to Make the Leap?2 months ago
- Yang Hansen's 12-Day NBA Draft Workout Marathon: A Data-Driven Breakdown of the Grueling Schedule2 months ago
- Yang Hansen's NBA Draft Journey: 80% of Teams in the 20-30 Range Have Completed Workouts with the Rising Star2 months ago
- Yang Hansen's NBA Draft Journey: 10 Team Workouts in 11 Days - A Data-Driven Breakdown2 months ago
- ESPN's 2025 Mock Draft: Flagg, Harper Lead Top Picks, Chinese Center Yang Lands at No. 35 to Sixers2 months ago
- Draft Analyst Rafael Barlowe on Yang Hansen: 'If Zach Edey Can Make the NBA, So Can He!'2025-6-30 7:26:20