वैनव्लीट का रॉकेट्स में बने रहना

सदमा में, परंतु समझदारी

मुझे सच कहूँ, मुझे उम्मीद नहीं थी कि फ्रेड वैनव्लीट हिस्टन में होगा। 2019 में, प्रतिद्वंद्वी-सबल होलग्रड़िज़्म-आधारित प्रयत्नों में, ‘इज़्ज़त’ (heart) -बढ़त-पथखड़ियों का प्रतीक।

लेकिन हमारे पास $50 मिलियन —2 साल।

रॉकेट्स নे सिर्फ ‘उसे’ बचाया—बल्कि आग्रह करके बधाई!

यह ‘सभी-सभी’ पुनर्निर्माण-आधुनिक’ (identity) हई।

अब, ‘जलववल’ (Jalen Green) स健康/खुश - इससे ‘पुषट’ (Harden) + ‘शुभ’ = ?

इसलए: यह ताकत -एवं-अभिमुख? गठबंधन?

‘फ्रेड’ – हथेली में ‘फट’

अगर:

• 57.8% TS% (2023–24)
• 4.6 A/G, 31 M/G
• 104.9 DRTG – Top 15 among guards >1800 mins.
• 43% from three on >6 attempts per game. yes: he’s not a superstar — but don’t confuse quiet with low value.

‘अंक’ —घड़ियों में…

yes: you can’t carry team—but you can lead. his off-ball movement? Elite. Turnover rate? Low. Pick-and-roll pace? Top 8 percentile. power stats:

• Offensive Win Shares/48: +1.7
• Defensive Win Shares: +0.6
• Net Rating When On: +3.4 | Off: -3.9 → The numbers don’t lie. matters more than the noise.

Kya yeh hain smart move for Rockets?

sure — for these Rockets? Yes. They’re not chasing titles yet—they’re building systems based on spacing, execution & toughness.*The Manu Ginóbili vibe wasn’t just aesthetic—it was functional.*The culture shift from fire-and-forget to calculated precision starts here—with VanVleet as its conductor. P.S.: Watching him hit mid-range over double teams gives me chills… even if I yell ‘C’MON’ at my screen like a madman during Game 7s back in ’19. The man lives by the mantra: Trust your craft. And that resonates with me as someone who spends hours tweaking radar charts until they look right under red LED lighting in my garage lab—or wherever I do analysis while wearing sweatpants labeled ‘Laker Fan’ (not because I support them anymore… okay maybe still).

Final Verdict: More Than Just Contract Paperwork

This deal isn’t just about keeping a good player—it’s about sending a message: “We believe in process.” The man brings leadership without ego, intelligence without arrogance, and scoring without spectacle—but results that matter on both ends.