যুদ্ধকারীদের ৪ বছর

by:StatAlchemist1 মাস আগে
1.66K
যুদ্ধকারীদের ৪ বছর

পতনেরআগেহাইপ

“আগামীমusumkablaun.” — 2021-এইকথাৎহয়।আমি,অভিযোগসহজনহিসাব?আমি,ডিজিটলফাঁদজড়িত।

2021-22: Kuminga -

খবр;Murray & Payton;চ্যামপিয়নশিপচক্‌ষণ।

অধিকত.উচচ্‌ষণ:

“সবক’চ’জয়!”

###বছর1:

Kuminga -

Spike -

Moody -

calmer -

True Shooting Rate: +10%

Fan Debate: “Who’s more fun?”

Code comment: // Emotional bias > statistical output → risk of systemic misallocation

###বছर2:

Payton → Portland; Murray → Toronto; Looney → Free agency; draymond → Traded. The team lost identity. The starting five showed +8 net rating in early 2023 — but win-loss? Mediocre. The coach overplayed Diya — emotional debt from draft night. Pascal Siakam outperformed him in efficiency. The fans screamed about “coaching injustice.” Data said otherwise.

###বছর3:

Brandin Podziemski arrived with quiet precision. Enter Podziemski. No TikTok fame. No flash. But his screen-setting and reads were elite for a rookie at age 21. The internal model showed his offensive impact matched that of a rotation guard after four months — if you ignored social media noise. The team missed playoffs for the first time since Steph’s peak era — despite two lottery picks still learning their roles. The blame? Poor long-term planning rooted in short-term sentimentality rather than predictive modeling.

###বছর4: Now we’re here — four years later — and people still say ‘Diya was mistreated.’ As if consistency matters less than narrative momentum?

Let me run the regression:

• Diya averaged 67% true shooting rate vs league average for similar position players at same age → below average • Usage rate peaked at ~35% during stretch run… then dropped when injuries hit • Team net rating during his minutes: -3 per 100 possessions • In contrast: Podziemski’s net rating +7 during same span

So yes—some fans feel cheated because their emotional investment wasn’t validated by results. But sports aren’t personal drama series—they’re optimization problems with human variables added late for flavor.

Final thought:
Don’t confuse loyalty with logic.

I’m still rooting for improvement—but only if it comes from data-driven decisions.

Want more breakdowns like this?

Drop your thoughts below — what player’s career trajectory surprised you most?

StatAlchemist

লাইক52.19K অনুসারক2.46K

জনপ্রিয় মন্তব্য (4)

दिल्लीका_हुपराज

4 साल की निराशा

वॉरियर्स के साथ 4 साल… जब तक मैंने ‘डिविंसेंजो’ को प्रति मैच 35% गोल करते हुए देखा, मैंने सोचा - ‘अब बस हमारी बहुत प्यारी है!’

पर डेटा कहता है - इसके मिनटों में टीम -3 पॉइंट्स

जबकि पॉडज़ियम्स्की? ‘4 महीने में Roto-Guard-लेवल प्रभाव’! पर TikTok पर कोई भी इसका क्लिप नहीं करता!

फैन्स? ‘डिया को समझाओ!’ पर data says - आपको समझने की ज़रूरत है 😅

खुदगर्ज़ी vs. सटीकता — फुटबॉल (अच्छा) vs. NBA (गणित)

आपको कौन पसंद है? डिया? पॉडज़ियम्स्की?

#वॉरियर्स #डेटाफ्रेंडलीफ़्यान #NBA #फ़्यानवशुद्ध_खेल

Comment section mein batao — kis player ka career surprise kar gaya?

483
13
0
戦国アナリスト
戦国アナリスト戦国アナリスト
1 মাস আগে

## 4年目の現実

『ディヤは扱いが悪かった』って言うけど、データ見てんのか?

4年間、チームの勝率は下がりっぱなし。ディヤのTS%はリーグ平均より低いのに、ファンは『感情的に応援した』って言い訳。

## データと感情の対決

一方でポジエムスキは、35%シュート率+9のNET RATING。TikTokで話題にならないけど、毎試合正確にパスを出してる。

ファンたち:「コールドプレイだ!」→ データ:「いや、効率悪いからね」

## 感情より論理を

スポーツはドラマじゃない。最適化問題だよ。ロイヤルティじゃ勝てない。

だから俺は…データで判断する。お前らどう思う?

評論欄で戦争開始!🔥

317
12
0
GhiĐiểmSàiGòn
GhiĐiểmSàiGònGhiĐiểmSàiGòn
1 মাস আগে

4 năm thất vọng – mà vẫn yêu!

Từ khi nghe câu nói “Next season, no one wants to face us” năm 2021, mình đã tin vào hệ thống như một nhà khoa học thực thụ.

Nhưng rồi… Kuminga thì bốc đồng, Moody thì lặng lẽ nhưng hiệu quả – dữ liệu không sai đâu!

Lỗi tại cảm xúc?

Sau khi mất cả đội hình cũ, họ gọi về “Diya” – đúng tên thật chứ không phải Jalen Suggs hay Jordan Poole! Dù số liệu cho thấy anh chỉ làm team rating -3100 possession… fan vẫn hét lên: “Chơi tệ vì bị ghẻ lạnh!”

Tương lai ở đâu?

Rồi Podziemski đến – không viral trên TikTok, nhưng net rating +9 và chuyền bóng như máy tính. Mình nghĩ: Đừng nhầm lòng trung thành với logic!

Còn bạn? Có ai từng bị cảm xúc đánh lừa vì một cầu thủ không? Comment đi! 🏀💥

85
36
0
दिल्ली का हुप्स्टर

ये वाली सीज़न में डेटा कभी झूठ नहीं बोलता… पर क्रिकेट के स्टेडियम पर हुआ! गैरी पैटन II के ‘clutch threes’ पर मौसेस मूडी की ‘calm efficiency’ से हम सबको हंसी। 100 पॉसेशन्स पर -3 net rating? अच्छा! कोच के पास cricket bat है — NBA में Kumblea nahi, Parthiv Suggs! 😅 #WarriorsKaDard #DataYaHai

29
24
0
ইন্ডিয়ানা পেসার্স