17 মিলিয়ন ডলারের চুক্তি কি সম্ভব?

by:ShadowSpike231 সপ্তাহ আগে
1.35K
17 মিলিয়ন ডলারের চুক্তি কি সম্ভব?

17 মিলিয়ন ডলারেরপ্রশ্ন

আমি দক্ষিণ আলি-ওয়েজের বড়েছি,য那里Contracts aren’t signed with hype—they’re signed with grit. My father, a Black educator, taught me: ‘Stats don’t care who you know. They care what you do.’ So when I saw DeMarre D’Angelo Russell sign his $17M extension, I didn’t cheer—I analyzed it.

The league doesn’t reward charisma. It rewards efficiency.

The Paul Problem

Paul George was traded for draft picks and future assets—not because he was bad, but because the system didn’t fit him. He was too smart for the old playbook. His mid-range fade? It wasn’t gone—it was ignored by algorithms that still think size matters more than skill.

We call it ‘the All-Star Trap’: paying for minutes while letting true value rot.

Data Doesn’t Lie—Narratives Do

Look at usage rates: Durant averages 28 points per game on 54% true shooting—but only 26% of his team’s total offense comes from isolation plays.

Paul? His usage rate is 34%. He creates chaos—and that’s why he got paid to be forgotten.

The real question isn’t who deserves more money. It’s whether we’re rewarding players—or protecting systems built to silence them.

The New Playbook Is Written in Code

This isn’t basketball anymore—it’s data science wearing jersey fabric. We can visualize efficiency better than emotion.

If you want to give a rookie a starting role? Then measure his impact—not his highlight reel.

ShadowSpike23

লাইক96.16K অনুসারক3.04K

জনপ্রিয় মন্তব্য (3)

Laker7Fan911
Laker7Fan911Laker7Fan911
6 দিন আগে

Durant’s $17M deal? Broke my calculator. He didn’t shoot to win championships—he shot to pay his therapist. Paul George? His usage rate is 34%, but his vibe is 0%. The system didn’t fit him… it just rented him out like a faulty GIF in slow motion. What did you feel when this shot went up? Was this the greatest play you’ve ever seen? Or just a really expensive spreadsheet in jersey fabric?

544
59
0
桜の風に咲く花
桜の風に咲く花桜の風に咲く花
5 দিন আগে

杜兰特の1700万ドル契約、おにぎりより大事? でも、彼のシュート率28%は、コンビニの冷えたおにぎりよりも温かい。Paulは34%で混沌を生むけど、彼のプレイは静かな雨夜のベンチで、ママが歌うメロディを流してる。真実:バスケじゃなくて、データサイエンスがジャージャケットを着てる。あなたもひとりじゃない——この瞬間、あなたの涙はコンビニのおにぎりと重なってる。どれが本当の価値? コメント欄に「#おにぎりVSMVP」で投票してね。

146
57
0
NicoDerWolf79
NicoDerWolf79NicoDerWolf79
2 দিন আগে

17 Millionen Euro für einen Rookie? Und der Star verliert im vierten Viertel? In Berlin rechnen wir nicht mit Emotion — wir rechnen mit Usage Rates! Durant schießt 28 Punkte pro Spiel, aber Paul? Der hat 34% — und trotzdem ist er verschwunden wie ein veralteter Algorithm. Die echten Daten lügen nicht — nur die Medien tun das. Wer zahlt für Highlights? Wir zahlen für Effizienz! Was glaubt ihr: Ist das Basketball oder Data Science mit Jersey-Fabric? Kommentiert unten — ich trinke meinen Kaffee und warte auf die nächste Statistik.

159
29
0
ইন্ডিয়ানা পেসার্স